The Crime of Chicken Terrorism

The Crime of Chicken Terrorism

On October 23, 2009, in an interview with Bill Moyers, Judge Richard Goldstone described what he had seen with his own eyes when he went to Gaza to investigate allegations of war crimes on behalf of the UN Human Rights Council:

"I saw the destruction of the only flour-producing factory in Gaza. I saw fields plowed up by Israeli tank bulldozers. I saw chicken farms, for egg production, completely destroyed. Tens of thousands of chicken killed. I met with families who lost their loved ones in homes in which they were seeking shelter from the Israeli ground forces. I had to have the very emotional and difficult interviews with fathers whose little daughters were killed, whose family were killed. One family, over 21 members, killed by Israeli mortars. So, it was a very difficult investigation, which will give me nightmares for the rest of my life" (Bill Moyers Journal http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10232009/watch.html).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's defiant speech at the UN claims that the destruction was an act of self-defence:

"A democracy legitimately defending itself against terror is morally hanged, drawn and quartered, and given an unfair trial to boot. By these twisted standards, the UN Human Rights Council would have dragged Roosevelt and Churchill to the dock as war criminals. What a perversion of truth. What a perversion of Justice ... The same UN that cheered Israel as it left Gaza, the same UN that promised to back our right of self-defence now accuses us -- my people, my country -- of being war criminals? And for what? For acting responsibly in self-defence. For acting in a way that any country would act. With a restraint unmatched by many. What a travesty. Ladies and gentlemen, Israel justly defended itself against terror. This biased and unjust report provides a clear-cut test for all governments. Will you stand with Israel or will you stand with the terrorists?" (Bill Moyers Journal http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10232009/watch.html).

According to The Legal Dictionary, courts and tribunals have accepted self-defence as a legitimate response to aggression. The noun "self-defence" is used to describe "reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she ... is ... in danger ... The force used in self-defence may be sufficient for protection from apparent harm ... but cannot be an excuse to continue the attack or use excessive force ... Appropriate self-defence is judged on all the circumstances" and the person claiming self-defence must prove at trial that the self-defence was justified and necessary (The Free Dictionary http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Self-Defense).

The legal definition does not explain the destruction of the chicken farms in Gaza -- "I saw chicken farms, for egg production, completely destroyed." Neither does it explain the killing of "tens of thousands of chickens." Perhaps Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has an explanation. To help him impress the UN Human Rights Council with his claims of self-defence, I have come up with a few suggestions.

For one thing, Netanyahu can claim that those chickens were connected to Al-Qaeda and were planning to attack civilian and military targets in Israel. Netanyahu certainly knows the value of "false-flag" terror attacks -- the "failed Al Qaeda bombing attempt" on Christmas Day attracted the attention of Zionist-controlled mass media and served to propagate the Zionist fraud called "The War on Terror." He can suggest that the chickens had taken a pledge of loyalty to Osama bin Laden and some had undergone extensive training in one of the camps in Afghanistan. To spice it up a little further, Mossad can then concoct another tape/video by an Osama bin Laden impersonator admitting to the crime of chicken terrorism.

Netanyahu can even copy George W. Bush's January 2002 State of the Union Address to Congress, claiming that those chickens constituted "axis of evil" comparable to Iran, North Korea and Iraq. Similar to George W. Bush, Netanyahu can claim that those chickens had been plotting to develop weapons of mass destruction, that they had stockpiled anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons. Mossad can be of special help in this noble endeavour: it can plant anthrax, nerve gas or even nuclear weapons in the chicken farms to provide evidence.

Another idea, useful to Netanyahu is the claim that those chickens had "dirty bombs." Israel is said to possess a number of "suitcase" type nuclear weapons, secretly supplied by Bush and company. Strategically planted by Mossad agents, these bombs will cause mass panic and terror to prove Iran's and Syria's active involvement in chicken terrorism, and guarantee an attack on these rogue states. The timing of these "events" is important. Netanyahu must remember that the effects of 9/11 are wearing out. Shoe Bombers, Crotch Bombers are necessary, but not enough to justify the sale of Mr. Chertoff's Full Body Scanners worldwide -- a small favour to a fellow Zionist. Chicken terrorism is the way of the future. First of all, Netanyahu will look good at the UN next time he shows his face to claim self-defence. Second, chicken terrorism will provide sufficient proof for Israel's claim that IDF is the most moral fighting force in the world. And finally, it will help topple any legitimate government Israel chooses. Just say the magic words "chicken terrorism," and the world will listen.